"The
Beginning of the Signs" John
2:1-11 Theme: The first miracle performed
by Jesus demonstrates His ability to transform what He has created into
something new.
The Changes in the Relationships
of Jesus – 2:1-4
The Appeal to His Power – vv.
1-3
Jesus and His disciples proceeded promptly on a
70 mile journey that they had three days to make in order to attend "a
wedding in Cana of Galilee," to which "Jesus also
was invited."
It is apparent from the prestigious role played
by Mary that it was the wedding of someone who was either part of Jesus
family or very close to the family
Cana was only about 9-12 miles north of Nazareth
When the wine ran out, Mary felt compelled to do
something about it.
Mary had the authority to usurp the headwaiter’s
authority to order the servants what to do – cp. v.
5
It can be assumed that Jesus, having been absent
now for well over a month, filled His mother in on what had transpired.
She may have even been told about the dove’s descending
at His baptism and putting that together with the prophecies that she had
"treasured in her heart" (Luke
2:19) and was aware that Jesus had initiated His
Messianic duties.
As a result, she comes to Him and asks Him to do
something – appealing to Him as a son to deliver her and the host from
actual liability for the fact that "they have no wine."
The Answer re: His Prerogatives
– v. 4
Most mothers have trouble with the fact that their
children grow up . . . always trying to "mother" them.
Jesus’ response to His mother’s approach of Him
demonstrates His subtle, yet forceful communiqué that the relationship
had changed: "Woman . . ." not "Mother."
This demonstrates that Mary herself was subjected
to Christ’ authority and is no "Co-Redemptrix"
The remainder of the response demonstrates that
the authority that previously existed had been turned completely around:
"What do I have to do with you?" –
that is, "What accountabilities do I now have to you?"
He then states that He Himself would determine what
needs to be done and when: "My hour is
not yet come." – that is, the timing of even the first miracle
was detailed in the redemptive plan of God.
The Confidence in the Role of Jesus
– 2:5-8
The Confidence Seen in the Order
– v. 5
Mary’s response demonstrated the appropriate yieldedness
to the authority of God.
She expresses confidence in the power and authority
of Jesus by issuing an order to the servants: "Whatever
He says to you, do it."
This is the attitude that all men ought to possess
in relationship to Jesus Christ – cp. Matthew
28:20.
The Confidence Seen in the Obedience
– vv. 6-8
Notice also the tremendous obedience that was shown
by the servants as they cooperated with the seemingly ridiculous instructions
of Jesus.
"Now there were six stone waterpots set
there for the Jewish custom of purification, containing twenty or their
gallons each" – huge, heavy containers requiring somewhere
around 150 gallons of water to fill.
Jesus instructs the servants "Fill the
waterpots with water"
Their obedience together with Mary’s oversight demonstrated
a confidence in the role of Jesus: "So they filled the up to
the brim."
Then Jesus told them "Draw some out now
and take it to the headwaiter." – an obvious potential embarrassment
if the servant were to bring water to the headwaiter as a suggestion to
serve.
It is interesting that later, John states that this
event was a miracle, "a sign" used to point to the deity of Christ.
However, it also portrayed the work of Christ – emptiness of religion,
the work of conversion as a man becomes a new creature, the need for men
to have faith in Christ to do this miraculous work.
The Clarity in the Revelation of
Jesus – 2:9-11
The Purity of His Action – vv.
9-10
Some have attempted to use this text as a means
to justify the drinking of intoxicating beverages – stating that since
Jesus turned water into wine, there can’t be anything wrong with drinking.
Notice the significance of what is stated here:
"When the headwaiter tasted the water which had become wine,
and did not know where it came from (but the servants who had drawn the
water knew), the headwaiter called the bridegroom."
He was thrilled that the tragedy had been averted,
that new wine had been obtained from somewhere.
His surprise was not simply that wine had been obtained,
but the "quality" of the wine outstripped what they had been
served previously: "Every man serves the good wine first, and
when the people have drunk freely, then he serves the poorer wine; but
you have kept the good wine until now."
This statement is significant because it demonstrates
several principles that must be recognized lest the Lord be accused of
providing the means by which intoxicated men became even more drunk.
First, recognize that the fermentation of the "juice
of the vine" was something that quickly occurred because of the want
of refrigeration.
To be able to serve wine "straight" (unmixed
with water) was rare because of the fermentation process.
Drinking fresh, non-fermented wine was a rare treat
– being considered as the "good wine" while the fermented stuff
that had to be diluted was considered the "poorer wine"
Consider the situation – people had been drinking
greatly – having at first been given the least intoxicating beverage until
that ran out, then been served the harder, more intoxicating wine until
that too was gone.
They would have had to dilute it until it was very
weak – in part to minimize the intoxication of the guest, but also to try
to make it stretch.
Then Jesus performs the miracle and the headwaiter
tastes it and asks: "Why have you kept the purest, unfermented, undiluted,
most delicious wine until now? Most people serve this stuff first."
My conclusion on this matter is that this "wine"
was not fermented at all and was non-intoxicating.
Otherwise if the "good wine" was of the
most highly fermented and intoxicating kind, Jesus was throwing the "hardest"
stuff at people that were already on the brink of inebriation – and this
just cannot be.
Hence this account cannot be used to suggest that
it is perfectly acceptable for people to drink intoxicating beverages today
The US government has declared that alcoholism is
the Nations’ #1 drug problem
Each ½ ounce of alcohol takes about an hour
to be processed and affects the body throughout the duration – a 16 oz
can of beer – 5 oz glass of wine – and a 1 ½ oz shot of 100 proof
vodka reportedly have identical levels of ethanol.
Ephesians
5:18 states: "Do not get drunk with wine,
for that is dissipation, but be filled with the Spirit." – my
question is that if ethanol is mainlined and affects the body throughout
the duration of being processed, how much "under the influence"
do we have to be before we are disobeying this command?
Scripture warns us not to get involved in drinking
intoxicating beverages: Proverbs
20:1; Proverbs
23:29-32 on simply the basis of wisdom.
Those who are separated for the service of God as
priests were forbidden to drink wine – Leviticus
10:9-11 and we are called by God to be a "royal
priesthood."
When clarity of mind is required to maintain justice
and righteousness, the advice to us is to totally abstain – cp. Proverbs
31:4-5
The Purpose of His Action –
v. 11
John states that "This
beginning of His signs Jesus did in Cana of Galilee"
By definition, a "sign" was an event that
carried with it a deeper meaning – pointing to another reality beyond the
event itself.
John states that what this event and the other "signs"
performed by Jesus pointed to was how He "manifested
His glory" – demonstrating that He was the Son of God.
The consequence of this "sign"
was the fact that "His disciples believed in Him."
– it was designed to allow men & women of sincere heart to have faith
strengthened.